<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will the s**t hit the fan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506</link>
	<description>What&#039;s new, funny, perplexing in Hawke&#039;s Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bosley</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506/comment-page-1#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>[Edited] With the zealous support of Mayor Barbara Arnott (when a councillor, along with the compliant supporting councillors Kathy Furlong and Dave Pipe etc) Napier City Council splashed-out over $9 million on upgrading the Fish Tank - recently reported to be costing ratepayers over $12,000 per week to keep going. Now in need of a $500,000 roof repair job and with no scheduled preventive maintainence having been carried out, the aquarium looks set to become a millstone around Napier ratepayers necks for many, many years to come!

If Napier Council had stuck to its knitting-core business, after all what we irate- payers pay our rates for?  And kept its nose out of the private business sector. It would have all the money to put into the much needed &quot;essential services&quot;  Diane and Tom mention, absolutely essential ground services etc, without having to raise endless costly loans. Conditions in Jervoistown, Bayview and HB coastal areas are akin or, at times, exactly the same as SQUALID out-bush Third World countries! 

Seriously, as any rates increases are largely unsustainable for the majority of people on fixed to diminishing incomes, Councils should NEVER be in the business in of putting huge amounts of ratepayers&#039; money into  RISKY business ventures. For that, I sincerely hope the NEW Minister of Local Government will introduce an ACT of Parliament to hold mayors and councillors &quot;personally financially accountable&quot; (no different to the Code for Company Directors), not just simply at the ballot box. 

In the real world, foisting a legacy of &quot;public debt&quot; on Napier&#039;s and Hastings&#039; future generations is nothing short of criminal.

Would the Mayor and Councillors of our Twin Cities risk doing it with their very own money? Yea right !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Edited] With the zealous support of Mayor Barbara Arnott (when a councillor, along with the compliant supporting councillors Kathy Furlong and Dave Pipe etc) Napier City Council splashed-out over $9 million on upgrading the Fish Tank &#8211; recently reported to be costing ratepayers over $12,000 per week to keep going. Now in need of a $500,000 roof repair job and with no scheduled preventive maintainence having been carried out, the aquarium looks set to become a millstone around Napier ratepayers necks for many, many years to come!</p>
<p>If Napier Council had stuck to its knitting-core business, after all what we irate- payers pay our rates for?  And kept its nose out of the private business sector. It would have all the money to put into the much needed &#8220;essential services&#8221;  Diane and Tom mention, absolutely essential ground services etc, without having to raise endless costly loans. Conditions in Jervoistown, Bayview and HB coastal areas are akin or, at times, exactly the same as SQUALID out-bush Third World countries! </p>
<p>Seriously, as any rates increases are largely unsustainable for the majority of people on fixed to diminishing incomes, Councils should NEVER be in the business in of putting huge amounts of ratepayers&#8217; money into  RISKY business ventures. For that, I sincerely hope the NEW Minister of Local Government will introduce an ACT of Parliament to hold mayors and councillors &#8220;personally financially accountable&#8221; (no different to the Code for Company Directors), not just simply at the ballot box. </p>
<p>In the real world, foisting a legacy of &#8220;public debt&#8221; on Napier&#8217;s and Hastings&#8217; future generations is nothing short of criminal.</p>
<p>Would the Mayor and Councillors of our Twin Cities risk doing it with their very own money? Yea right !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Charteris</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506/comment-page-1#comment-15195</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Charteris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506#comment-15195</guid>
		<description>Yes - a big issue that does need urgent attention. Having watched over 35  years kids of our street (ours included) regularly have enormous fun paddling, boogie boarding, rowing boats, and after the most recent event the locals with their table and chairs in the middle of it sipping wine ( to stop the hoons driving through and getting stuck and sending waves into low lying houses) every time the street goes hip deep under water after rain bombs, gives an idea of the problem. After prolonged heavy rain guess what we smell! Youv&#039;e got it- sewage!!! The stormwater pipes of our street have been upgraded but it can still flood. Now with the infill developments there are new flood prone areas that were OK before. With the Park Estate development on land which has been raised considerably in preperation for the development we now have a new problem for the residents along Westminister Avenue and vicinities. So far fortunately we have not had sickness but the risk lurks. I will be one of the &quot;pests&quot; on Wednesday at NCC hearings although my susmission only briefly touches on the issue but the more people who get on board the better. The new wastwater standards proposal document is available from the Ministry in hard copy and on their website. It is up to us all to push for it to be actioned. Hopefully the HBRC will put their own set of standards into action and demand compliance in the near future while the NSWW are delayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; a big issue that does need urgent attention. Having watched over 35  years kids of our street (ours included) regularly have enormous fun paddling, boogie boarding, rowing boats, and after the most recent event the locals with their table and chairs in the middle of it sipping wine ( to stop the hoons driving through and getting stuck and sending waves into low lying houses) every time the street goes hip deep under water after rain bombs, gives an idea of the problem. After prolonged heavy rain guess what we smell! Youv&#8217;e got it- sewage!!! The stormwater pipes of our street have been upgraded but it can still flood. Now with the infill developments there are new flood prone areas that were OK before. With the Park Estate development on land which has been raised considerably in preperation for the development we now have a new problem for the residents along Westminister Avenue and vicinities. So far fortunately we have not had sickness but the risk lurks. I will be one of the &#8220;pests&#8221; on Wednesday at NCC hearings although my susmission only briefly touches on the issue but the more people who get on board the better. The new wastwater standards proposal document is available from the Ministry in hard copy and on their website. It is up to us all to push for it to be actioned. Hopefully the HBRC will put their own set of standards into action and demand compliance in the near future while the NSWW are delayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Blackman</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506/comment-page-1#comment-15193</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Blackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1506#comment-15193</guid>
		<description>Well said Tom, and as well of this no one seems particularly concerned about a 50 - 60 unit development up on the Hill. And we all know what flows down hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Tom, and as well of this no one seems particularly concerned about a 50 &#8211; 60 unit development up on the Hill. And we all know what flows down hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
