<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napier and Regional Councils will collide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724</link>
	<description>What's new, funny, perplexing in Hawke's Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dexter McGhie</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724/comment-page-1#comment-19044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter McGhie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724#comment-19044</guid>
		<description>We need more useless expenditure like we need a hole in the head!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need more useless expenditure like we need a hole in the head!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bosley</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724/comment-page-1#comment-19002</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724#comment-19002</guid>
		<description>When it comes to the lack of &quot;essential&quot;  inground services. In allowing the likes of the leaching and the overflowing of &quot;raw human&quot; effluent !  Trendy Art Deco Barbaraville &amp; Co must rate along, with that, of prescribing to Third World standards. 
Absolutely disgraceful-particulary when one considers how much Napier City Council &quot;forced&quot; its ratepayes to fork out on the Non essential &quot;ever&quot; costing NINE million dollar PLUS fish-tank. Not to mention the, un-disclosed&#039;  huge amounts (settled with lawyers!!) in compo payments to the poor buggers stuck with, Council ticked off &quot;leaky&quot;  homes ?  

Agreed, I believe the supposed DHB&#039;s&#039; guardians of our citizens well-being must be either asleep - or as thick as the perverbial tutae!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the lack of &#8220;essential&#8221;  inground services. In allowing the likes of the leaching and the overflowing of &#8220;raw human&#8221; effluent !  Trendy Art Deco Barbaraville &amp; Co must rate along, with that, of prescribing to Third World standards.<br />
Absolutely disgraceful-particulary when one considers how much Napier City Council &#8220;forced&#8221; its ratepayes to fork out on the Non essential &#8220;ever&#8221; costing NINE million dollar PLUS fish-tank. Not to mention the, un-disclosed&#8217;  huge amounts (settled with lawyers!!) in compo payments to the poor buggers stuck with, Council ticked off &#8220;leaky&#8221;  homes ?  </p>
<p>Agreed, I believe the supposed DHB&#8217;s&#8217; guardians of our citizens well-being must be either asleep &#8211; or as thick as the perverbial tutae!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724/comment-page-1#comment-18888</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1724#comment-18888</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that there are a number of innovative ways available for households to avoid septic tanks or reticulation. Shouldn&#039;t we look outside the conventional square on this one and find ways to bring these technolgies to bear not just to new developments in the areas concerned but in retrofitting the old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that there are a number of innovative ways available for households to avoid septic tanks or reticulation. Shouldn&#8217;t we look outside the conventional square on this one and find ways to bring these technolgies to bear not just to new developments in the areas concerned but in retrofitting the old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
