<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of HPUDS!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s new, funny, perplexing in Hawke&#039;s Bay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosscoe Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801/comment-page-1/#comment-20806</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosscoe Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801#comment-20806</guid>
		<description>Tena koe 

Re - beware of the HPUBS

How can an issue that will effect the sustainabilty of land use throughout the motu for the next thirty years, have a submission deadline that is completely unachievable within the time frame [ christmas and holidays ] to the majority of submitters.

There are several other examples of this unacceptable timeframe, where submitters have had no choice but to rightly request an extension to the submission and consultation process.

Which highlights the question, are the sneaky buggers attempting to derail the submission process in order to suit their own agenda ?

The more we ask the questions and demand fair and inclusive consultation with realistic submission and consultation timeframes the better off we are all going to be.

All the best for 2010

Rosscoe Brown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tena koe </p>
<p>Re &#8211; beware of the HPUBS</p>
<p>How can an issue that will effect the sustainabilty of land use throughout the motu for the next thirty years, have a submission deadline that is completely unachievable within the time frame [ christmas and holidays ] to the majority of submitters.</p>
<p>There are several other examples of this unacceptable timeframe, where submitters have had no choice but to rightly request an extension to the submission and consultation process.</p>
<p>Which highlights the question, are the sneaky buggers attempting to derail the submission process in order to suit their own agenda ?</p>
<p>The more we ask the questions and demand fair and inclusive consultation with realistic submission and consultation timeframes the better off we are all going to be.</p>
<p>All the best for 2010</p>
<p>Rosscoe Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Magill</title>
		<link>http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801/comment-page-1/#comment-20784</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Magill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baybuzz.co.nz/archives/1801#comment-20784</guid>
		<description>Time we thanked Tom,and the BayBuzz support group for their contribution to &quot;Beware of HPUBS&quot;
Politicians have many agenda&#039;s as they shuffle the pack to often  avoid public scrutiny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time we thanked Tom,and the BayBuzz support group for their contribution to &#8220;Beware of HPUBS&#8221;<br />
Politicians have many agenda&#8217;s as they shuffle the pack to often  avoid public scrutiny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/6 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk
Object Caching 257/260 objects using disk

Served from: www.baybuzz.co.nz @ 2012-02-10 22:58:32 -->
