fbpx

BayBuzz

Menu

HB Transport Shake-up – Part 2

Issues

Keith Newman16 April 2020

Part 2 (of two): Reimagining rail, bus and e-working

[Start with Part 1?]

In the lead up to coronavirus level 4 status major electronics chains had a run on computer screens, keyboards and wifi extenders as many employees discovered working from home was no longer optional but compulsory.

Remote working has been a ‘thing’ for a couple of decades but has been resisted by some employers who weren’t prepared either technically or culturally to cut their workers loose, fearing productivity may suffer.

Spin-off benefits of e-working – using email, collaborative tools and videoconferencing – include a reduced need for office space, less office parking and fewer cars on the road.

Reducing private vehicle use is one of the key tenets of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Transport Plan to be considered over the next year, along with better flow for big freight, reduced carbon emissions and increased use of public transport.

HBRC contracts GoBus to operate 23 GoBay services at peak times with a reduced fleet in off-peak hours across Napier-Hastings, Havelock North, Bay View, Flaxmere, Taradale and Clive annually carrying around 700,000 passengers over about 7.2 million kilometres.

While we’re at level 4, however there’s a reduced service which is free for use but limited to those involved in essential services or having to visit the supermarket. The proviso is that passengers have to sit two metres apart (https://www.gobay.co.nz/#bustimetable). Normal services will resume once the crisis is over.

A taxi mobility scheme for those unable to use public transport carries around 100,000 passengers a year. An aging population has meant more retirement villages are being built and the demand for such services and additional routes will only increase.

A proposal to bolster poor patronage with flat $1-$2 fees is being proposed in the long-term plan butneedsextra funding as HBRC looks for the elusive tipping point where carbon footprint reduction and economic benefit converge.

This thinking is based on NZTA calculations that for every 10% decrease in fares there would be a 4% increase in patronage with ‘public cost benefit’ accruals of between $8-$13 per public transport user.

The theoretical ‘benefits’ come through increased access and mobility, reduced vehicle use, less cars on the road, lower crash risk, and freeing up road and parking capacity. A 30% increase in public transport use is calculated to be worth over $2 million annually to the region.

Ian Emmerson says public transport has to operate better and wonders whether going into a negative budget to incentivise use, or even adding bus lanes or more stops, will reverse the declining patronage.

“In this day and age of convenience people will fly and drive … but not a hell of a lot think about jumping in a bus for convenience.”

The disclosure that there are only 16 electric buses operating around the country and none in Hawke’s Bay, isn’t exactly inspiring but Emmerson reckons that’s the way to go.

He says the most efficient use of EVs for heavy transport is in rubbish trucks and buses which stop and start regularly and generate energy.

“There’s some very good technology and a massive trend in Europe, Japan and China to adopt these so I don’t understand why we’re still putting new diesel vehicles on the road.”

Movement choices

3R’s Adele Rose says the public want lots of choices for bulk movement of people. “The region is not very well served with bus services between Central Hawke’s Bay and Napier-Hastings other than the Intercity bus from Wellington.”

Despite huge growth in recent years Central Hawke’s Bay has no consistent bus or train service. A couple of busloads a day commute to Hastings and Napier and lots of nurses travel up to the hospital.

Martin Williams doesn’t have the answers for improving public transport but is determined that the committee ask the right questions. “There may be some disruptive technologies involved; that’s not necessarily a negative connotation –  the cellphone was disruptive.”

How about supplementing HBRC bus services with a fleet of mini-buses –  possibly EV powered?

He’s watching the Canterbury Regional Council’s MyWay trial in Timaru where 12-seater mini-buses can be hailed on a smartphone app seven days a week. They’re not EVs but he’s open to something similar being deployed here.

If a fleet of roving EV minibuses took five cars off the road each, he suggests, it could reduce carbon emissions, defer road maintenance costs and create space on the motorway.

It sounds like a logistical nightmare but smart trip planning would be the key. Enter data about routes, transport use and demographics into the NZTA network operating framework planning tool and apparently it should spit out the answers.

Computer algorithms would then determine the best routes to pick up passengers and get them to their destinations on time using the optimal route.

It could be subsidised in a similar way to HBRC’s bus fleet, $2-$3 for a trip shared by 10-15 people. “We don’t know if it’ll be sustainable or if enough people will use it,” says Williams.

Trimming truck miles

3R Group CEO, Adele Rose says one way to reduce truck miles is to encourage backloading so they carry freight for other customers on the return trip from the Port and the hubs at Whakatu, Irongate and Awatoto.

Several companies specialise in brokering such deals but it means getting past competitive and commercial barriers to work co-operatively across projects.

Rose suggests the national transport plan needs to be seen in context with provisioning the whole network and its connectivity with Hawke’s Bay coastal and freight shipping and public transport.

For transport of goods, she says, that infrastructure needs to connect to rail and the seaports to reduce the need for trucks because “that’s where our big reduction in emissions will come from”.

While progress is being made on electrifying heavier vehicles, most solutions are unsuited to New Zealand roads and the gross combination mass (GCM), the total weight a truck and trailer can carry, says Ian Emmerson.

He says electrics will only be efficient in up to 18 tonne vehicles, beyond that the tare (unladen) weight including the battery is not practical.

“Then we have to think about discarding the battery at the end of its life. I think we get too excited about the carbon footprint without considering the lithium in the battery when its buggered.”

Most carriers are looking at alternatives including biofuels; his own company Emmerson Transport is doing a study on a hydrogen stand-alone plant for the PanPac pulp operation.

“We can only work within the engineering capabilities that are there but at the end of the day we’re all conscious of our responsibility with customers asking about our carbon footprint and our plan going forward.”

Rail underused

So we’re back to boosting the rail option. About 5% of the freight being moved around the region is carried by rail with the line south from Napier deemed commercially viable, growing over 40% between 2007 and 2012.

Volumes dropped off after 2014 with Ravensdown Fertiliser and Fonterra no longer exporting from Napier, although there was a temporary boost after the Kaikoura quake when Wellington’s CentrePort was damaged.

Projected increases in freight carriage present a massive challenge for the trucking industry and Ian Emmerson would like to see rail pick up a lot more of that work. “Railways needs a big rethink…currently only 6% of national freight tonnage goes by rail.”

The biggest restriction is our narrow gage rail tracks can’t handle greater tonnage. One solution, could be to increase the number of laneways on the main trunk line to let other trains pass.  “However, that limits the length of trains unless you lengthen all the laneways,”

While big investment is planned in Northland, Emmerson says KiwiRail has been slack in investing in infrastructure and rolling stock and he’s concerned the Government is using car and truck road user funding and petrol tax to subsidise it.

There’s also a call for greater use of rail to diversify the public transport network, although passenger rail services to Napier-Hastings and smaller towns on either side have been shut down for years.

Adele Rose says there’s a real push to get regional passenger trains moving again. “Look at Wellington to Wairarapa … that’s a highly used network.”

She believes the Wairoa line should also carry people. “This fits with the growing lifestyle choice of many young people who are not getting their licences or owning cars. That might be fine in the bigger cities but for our region they have to own a car to get around.”

Silo challenges

While there have been complaints about the high cost –  including subsidies –  of restoring the Wairoa railway line, Williams says 5,000 truckloads are off the road this year because one train a week brings all the logs down to Napier and lowers road maintenance costs.

He says, roads were never intended to be profitable or even be viable; they’re subsidised through road user charges and motor registrations; Hastings District Council for example has $100m in debt for its investment in roads.

“So why does rail suddenly have to be profitable? NZ Inc ends up paying for it one way or another.”

One thing he’s sure of personally is that the nation’s transport system is “ridiculously siloed”.

Previous transport committee agendas highlight the importance of joint management with neighbouring councils to avoid “cross-border misalignment” ensuring end-to-end resilience of the Napier-Wairoa, Napier-Taihape roads and the alternative route to Manawatu.

Napier-Taupo access would also have to be considered in that mix.

“We have something called the New Zealand Transport Agency but it’s a road control authority. If we had a real transport agency it would own KiwiRail and have a stake in the ports or at least provide the planning framework in which those entities operate.”

That he says is a Government issue. “In my thinking KiwiRail as a State-owned enterprise is frankly not interested in investing in its own network because it has to deliver a profit to its shareholders — a transport agency competing for funding for road projects is fundamentally wrong.”

Rather than isolated thinking, big picture planning involving all stakeholders and even out-of-the-box options and how they might work together is clearly needed.

If working from home reduces vehicle use then perhaps there should be employer and other incentives to do that at least a couple of days a week.

Compensating for the predicted exponential growth in big freight will require collaborative logistics including smarter route planning, backhauling and scheduling to avoid queues and jams.

Getting cars off the road to avoid major investment in widening motorway lanes will require an attitude shift that can only happen by convincing people public transport is not only cool, but convenient and reliable.

In a world where efficiency is everything, schedules and stops need to complement a workforce that needs to get there and back in a timely fashion.

The ‘market’ will also have to resolve the EV vs fossil fuel enigma, but electric public transport does sound appealing.

Meanwhile, more drastic measures – like big road freight and rail working more closely together – will be essential to ease congestion and ensure efforts to reach carbon neutral aren’t neutralised by inertia.

Go to Part 1

Keith Newman16 April 2020

3 responses to “HB Transport Shake-up – Part 2”

  1. Rosemary Marriott says:

    I have submitted for years to public transport reviews and always the same answer – we regularly survey our passengers. But I have tried to get would be passengers like myself, surveyed as well. All my life on both side of the Tasman I have used suburban buses and trains but now live in Hastings and am nowhere near a bus stop. So I have a car and my husband uses taxi chits. Further up our street there is the new health centre but it’s not on a bus route either. There needs to be flexibility and consumer co-design in planning our public transport network.

  2. Wallace Rae says:

    Maybe the basic problem is the length of the political term which is effectively 2 years – not enough time to develop a decent policy or to persuade the electorate that your policy is working.
    If we are to meet our carbon targets the price of car ownership should be increased and the price of the carbon levy increased incrementally by an order of magnitude. Then alternative transport technologies will have a chance.

  3. Richard Gardner says:

    If there is a silver lining to this convid 19 cloud it has to be in the that the savings in lives, injuries and insurance claims alone should make think ” outside the square “.putting more cars and trucks on the roads instead of
    Improving the rail systems,widening the rail gadge
    to increase tonnage,and reintroduce passenger between Gisbourne to Palmerston North
    connecting the small communities between,the freight could offset the cost of passenger
    fares,if instead of looking for a purely fiscal profit include a social .nett return. ie reduced deaths,injuries and insurance claims to the decrease the demands on health and emergency services,ACC.The flow on in savings is enormous. If only we get our political parties to work together on the transport
    challenges as they have on
    Convid 19,unfortunately they don’t tend to think” outside the square”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Future Is Now

01 June 2020

Sir Peter Gluckman, top science advisor in the previous government, has (with colleagues) prepared two ‘must read’ papers for anyone…

For Ocean Addicts

01 June 2020

Writing on a very wet day! The World Economic Forum in Switzerland is offering an  impressive series of webcasts over…

Sign up to The Buzz

Our free weekly email update reporting
on HB's important stuff