fbpx

BayBuzz

Menu

$151m we don’t want

Issues

Tom Belford10 September 2020

As we all know, 5867 cows and 41 of 43 crewmen perished when the livestock ship, Gulf Livestock 1, capsized en route from our Napier Port to China recently.

Year to date, NZ has earned $151 million from the export of live stock.

NZ First’s agriculture spokesman crystallises the issue this way: “It’s a $300m a year industry and that’s vital, especially when we need every dollar we can get.”

To use the farming vernacular … that’s bullshit – economically and morally. And just one more reason NZ First should be buried for good. A better outcome than the carcasses floating in the East China Sea.

The carefully cultivated image of happy, grass-fed cows feeding on glorious green pastures is one of the bedrock images that sustains ‘brand New Zealand’ and our huge agri-exports. That brand is immensely more valuable than some, by comparison, puny profits from export of live stock.

And it can be sunk by the sight of dead floating cows.

Sounding too emotional? Brands are all about emotion, dear readers!

Economics aside, more fundamental is the disturbing issue of animal welfare and the basic morality of transporting these poor beasts for days-long voyages, at whatever level of on-board care, to locations where they might or might not be well-cared for.

Most New Zealanders are (probably) still OK with exporting premium steaks and legs of lamb.

But I’d suggest that most New Zealanders are no more supportive of ferrying live cows to China than they are of exporting our water there.

So let’s just put a stop to it.

Labour is hiding behind a pending review of the issue by MPI. So is National. You’ve seen above the ‘dollars rule’ position of NZ First, which is echoed by ACT. Greens oppose live shipments.

But we here in Hawke’s Bay can skip all that bull.

I call upon the HB Regional Council, controlling owner of Napier Port, to deliver this simple message to the Port: No more exporting of live stock through our Napier Port.

Hawke’s Bay does not want to be part of this trade.

Let Chairman Rex Graham know your views!

Rex.Graham@hbrc.govt.nz

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Belford10 September 2020

8 responses to “$151m we don’t want”

  1. Helen Wenley says:

    An excuse I read somewhere was that New Zealand is sharing by exporting live animals. I think it’s an extremely cruel way to share. Just stop.

  2. Rosie Marriott says:

    It’s an immoral trade but it is also poor business. Why should we sell our prime stock to our business rivals so that, in due course, they will not need our dairy and beef products any more!

  3. Barbie Cassidy says:

    Live stock export is cruelty personified. I have been actively objecting for 28 years. The trip is horrendous and terrifying and “Life on the other side” no life at all.

  4. Georgia Saxon says:

    I am against cruelty to animals. These live exports of cattle must stop. I have written to Rex Graham as suggested. Hear our collective voices.

  5. Carole Green says:

    I agree with all of the above comments and most of all i donot accept cruelty to any living creatures …STOP live exports of animals to China and any other country

  6. Adele Marsh says:

    Did not realise to what extent the livestock exports are going on. Am appalled by the whole idea, absolute cruelty to those animals. They need to stop now.

  7. Darrin H says:

    Stop live export totally unnecessary

  8. James mcpetrie says:

    This must stop now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BayBuzz Sponsors

Sign up to The Buzz

Our free weekly email update reporting
on HB's important stuff

No thanks